CASE STUDY ON EK RUKA HUA FAISLA

In a group the task- focused action takes place towards the final stages of the group. The word dynamics with respect to a group summarizes the interaction between the members of the group, the impact of group structures on the actions of group members, the diversity of the group, the way in which groups become cohesive and the ability of the group to change over time. Ek Ruka Hua Faisla is a movie about 19 year old boy who was a suspect for murder of his father. The case against the boy seems irrefutable and all the jury members except one Juror 8 are convinced that the boy is guilty of killing his father. We learn that whenever a number of people from different background, mindset, and culture cometogether then conflicts are bound to happen. Sub groups form due to the interest alliances among the subsets of group members. There were many examples of conflicts between the jurors.

The personal bias of the juror 3 Pankaj Kapoor due to his experience with his own son which is revealed later in the movie also disrupts and actually stretches the whole process. All the jurors except one, votes against the boy this results in conflicts slightly. Effects of cohesion on the group:. The story begins in a courtroom where a teenage boy from a city slum is on trial for stabbing his father to death. Juror 5 Subhash Udghate:

There were many examples of conflicts between the jurors. Probably he is the only juror who understood his role and played it very well. It need not be perceived as a threat until and unless the subgroup affinity becomes more than the casf towards the group as a whole.

Then the foreman enters and lays down the rules and the voting is done. Handbook of Social Work with Groups. Case study on Power of Communication by movie – Ek ruka hua faisla.

Ek ruka hua faisla case study

Overall it was a good learning experience that helped me better understands human behavior, up to what level people can go and how one can tackle even deviant behavior in a group. Cultural differences among the group member result in the slow development of group culture.

  DISSERTATION FALK KOHLMANN

Group Dynamics The word dynamics with respect to a group summarizes the interaction between the members of the group, the impact of group structures on the actions of group members, the diversity of the group, the way in which groups become cohesive and the ability of the group to change over time. K Raina is not convinced that the boy is guilty and he starts the deliberations by giving an explanation that it is about the life of that boy and the conclusion should not be derived without resorting to any discussion.

And also all these stages need not be seen during the development of a group. You are commenting using your Google account.

Case study on Power of Communication by movie – Ek ruka hua faisla

Group members rely on safe, patterned behaviour and look towards the group leader for guidance and direction. High level of group integration is necessary for the effective functioning of the group. Only one juror is unconvinced of the boys involvement inthe crime resulting in a difference in opinion and further discussion on the case.

There was a committee of 12 people assigned to decide whether boy was culprit or not.

While the initial majority group is lead by juror 4 S. Remember me on this computer.

case study on ek ruka hua faisla

And this is done without even identifying any of them as belonging to any race or religion, to the extent that they are just referred to as jury one, jury two and so on. Human Resource Development International, Again the group is in performing stage.

Though he plays the role of the most divisive character who is falsely convinced that theaccused is rukq murderer; his dissentious stand was because, his only son deserted him, so thispainful relationship with his son caused anger toward all young people, thereby influencing hisvote. Roles refer to the functions the group members are supposed to play in a group. Then for a long while the group remains in the performing stage in which the focus is on the task at hand and on how to reach on a consensus with caes out bursts by juror 3, juror 7 and juror But finally, he speaks up about some evidencethat bothered him.

  BUSINESS PLAN COLTIVAZIONE MELOGRANO

Juror 2 Amitabh Srivastav: I know various things like group behavior, how group operates, how different people have different roles in group at sudy times.

Case study on Power of Communication by movie – Ek ruka hua faisla – [PDF Document]

The need for recognition The prestige which is availed by being in a group Benefits that can be acquired from the group Cohesiveness in a group satisfies the needs of the members in that group. You are commenting using your WordPress. The case against the boy seems irrefutable and all the jury members except one Juror 8 are convinced that the boy is guilty of killing his father.

case study on ek ruka hua faisla

He showed signs of thinker andcontroller in his decision making style. Sometimes, Conflicts can involve in the communication process. The members who initially jump from the majority to minority are those who lifted their hands late and were not sure about their decision during the first vote. In the fuka three types leader plays the major role and structures the patterns.

case study on ek ruka hua faisla

Analysis of the Movie: He very effortlessly demonstrates the role of a self-centered person whois more worried about his own comforts and leisure than being fair and detailed.